Talk:Nylon fetishism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nylon fetishism was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was REDIRECT

Requested as a speedy deletion. Reason given was: "no potential for an encylopedic entry." That is a valid reason for deletion, but not a valid reason for speedy deletion per Wikipedia:Candidates for speedy deletion. Accordingly, I am listing it here. I am listing this on behalf of User:CBDroege who made the speedy deletion request. Do not count me as voting. (And do not count User:CBDroege unless this user joins this discussion and votes here). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:05, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • We've piteous stubs at pantyhose fetishism and stocking fetishism also, that seem to be speaking of quite similar kinks. Any one of them is surely worthy of an article, but I suspect that the others should be merged and kept. Smerdis of Tlön 03:13, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Agree with above poster. siroχo 03:54, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Don't merge -- the topic is notable enough, and a lot could be said about it (e.g. groups devoted to that kind of stuff, their history, etc). --Improv 06:44, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: A single entry is sufficient, just as "nylons," "stockings," "hose," and "pantyhose" are all the same thing to some people, so all the articles on the fetish associated with these objects should be a single article. Of the possible terms, "nylon" is the worst, unless there are people skulking to their bedrooms with a Members Only jacket or a parachute with a guilty grin. Geogre 13:06, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • As I understand it, it's the fabric, not the legwear, that is the topic of the fetish. --Improv 17:13, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
      • Point of information... is nylon actually used as a hosiery fabric any more? I thought it had been displaced by more recent synthetics... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:25, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I would say merge, but there's simply nothing there to merge. - Lifefeed 20:57, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • These are legitimate fetishes but could easily be covered on a single page as they are all far too similar. I would say Delete two of the three and Merge any necessary information from the other two. Indrian 22:26, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge. --L33tminion | (talk) 19:40, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge with similar articles. Having all of these very similar fetishes in different articles is akin to litering. If merged in a single article, though, that would be relevant. Iñgólemo←• 07:06, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect. --Falsifian 18:20, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.